EU Trade Policy between Constitutional Openness and Strategic Autonomy

12Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

From 'strategic autonomy' to 'open strategic autonomy' in the 2021 EU Trade Policy Review - questioning the added value of the qualifier 'open' - legal exploration of 'openness' in EU external trade - identification of constitutional norms of 'openness' in the Treaties - strong constitutional preference for openness - discretion for trade liberalisation and multilateralism and international cooperation but strict obligation for compliance with international law - reviewing recent EU trade instruments in light of these norms - rise in unilateral trade policy instruments adopted since 2021 in pursuit of open strategic autonomy - instruments seeking to restore reciprocity in international trade relations - instruments using access to the internal market as a lever for achieving global sustainability goals - instruments preserving EU security through trade - problematic tensions with international law - very limited 'openness' in 'open strategic autonomy'.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kübek, G., & Mancini, I. (2023). EU Trade Policy between Constitutional Openness and Strategic Autonomy. European Constitutional Law Review, 19(3), 518–547. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019623000226

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free