Increased symmetric dimethylarginine, but not asymmetric dimethylarginine, concentrations are associated with transient myocardial ischemia and predict outcome

2Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: Asymmetric and symmetric dimethylarginines (ADMA and SDMA) are endothelial dysfunction markers. ADMA inhibits synthesis of nitric oxide. We aimed to analyze both markers in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who were referred for stress/rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS). Methods: All patients underwent a 2-day dipyridamole (DP) stress/rest protocol. Thereafter, patients with transient myocardial perfusion abnormality were followed up and their coronary blood flow was quantitatively assessed. Venous blood was taken before and after DP stress to measure markers. Results: Baseline ADMA and SDMA concentrations were significantly higher in patients with CAD compared with healthy subjects. Pre- and post-stress SDMA concentrations were significantly higher in patients with transient myocardial perfusion abnormality compared with those with negative MPS results. However, ADMA and L-arginine concentrations were not significantly different between the two groups. None of the markers were significantly different between patients with angiographically proven low coronary flow and those with normal coronary flow. Pre-stress SDMA concentrations were an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality during a 8-year follow-up. Conclusions: Elevated serum SDMA concentrations may be helpful for selecting high-risk patients with CAD if there is any doubt in interpreting MPS. SDMA concentrations may also predict cardiovascular outcome.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Szabo, Z., Bartha, E., Nagy, L., & Molnar, T. (2020). Increased symmetric dimethylarginine, but not asymmetric dimethylarginine, concentrations are associated with transient myocardial ischemia and predict outcome. Journal of International Medical Research, 48(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060520920439

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free