T2* and T1 assessment of abdominal tissue response to graded hypoxia and hypercapnia using a controlled gas mixing circuit for small animals

18Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To characterize T*2 and T1 relaxation time response to a wide spectrum of gas challenges in extracranial tissues of healthy rats. Materials and Methods: A range of graded gas mixtures (hyperoxia, hypercapnia, hypoxia, and hypercapnic hypoxia) were delivered through a controlled gas-mixing circuit to mechanically ventilated and intubated rats. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on a 3T clinical scanner; T*2 and T1 maps were computed to determine tissue response in the liver, kidney cortex, and paraspinal muscles. Heart rate and blood oxygen saturation (SaO2) were measured through a rodent oximeter and physiological monitor. Results: T*2 decreases consistent with lowered SaO2 measurements were observed for hypercapnia and hypoxia, but decreases were significant only in liver and kidney cortex (P < 0.05) for >10% CO2 and <15% O2, with the new gas stimulus, hypercapnic hypoxia, producing the greatest T*2 decrease. Hyperoxia-related T*2 increases were accompanied by negligible increases in SaO2. T1 generally increased, if at all, in the liver and decreased in the kidney. Significance was observed (P < 0.05) only in kidney for >90% O2 and >5% CO2. Conclusion: T*2 and T1 provide complementary roles for evaluating extracranial tissue response to a broad range of gas challenges. Based on both measured and known physiological responses, our results are consistent with T*2 as a sensitive marker of blood oxygen saturation and T1 as a weak marker of blood volume changes. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:305–316.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ganesh, T., Estrada, M., Duffin, J., & Cheng, H. L. (2016). T2* and T1 assessment of abdominal tissue response to graded hypoxia and hypercapnia using a controlled gas mixing circuit for small animals. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 44(2), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25169

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free