Family Medicine Residents’ Performance with Detected Versus Undetected Simulated Patients Posing as Problem Drinkers

  • Kahan M
  • Liu E
  • Borsoi D
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Abstract:Background: Simulated patients are commonly used to evaluate medical trainees. Unannounced simulated patients provide an accurate measure of physician performance.Purpose: To determine the effects of detection of SPs on physician performance, and identify factors leading to detection.Methods: Fixty-six family medicine residents were each visited by two unannounced simulated patients presenting with alcohol-induced hypertension or insomnia. Residents were then surveyed on their detection of SPs.Results: SPs were detected on 45 out of 104 visits. Inner city clinics had higher detection rates than middle class clinics. Residents’ checklist and global rating scores were substantially higher on detected than undetected visits, for both between-subject and within-subject comparisons. The most common reasons for detection concerned SP demographics and behaviour; the SP “did not act like a drinker” and was of a different social class than the typical clinic patient.Conclusions: Multi-clinic studies invol...

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kahan, M., Liu, E., Borsoi, D., Wilson, L., Brewster, J. M., Sobell, M. B., & Sobell, L. C. (2004). Family Medicine Residents’ Performance with Detected Versus Undetected Simulated Patients Posing as Problem Drinkers. Medical Education Online, 9(1), 4357. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v9i.4357

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free