Validation of the nottingham hip fracture score (Nhfs) in patients with hip fracture: A prospective cohort study in the Netherlands

18Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: The Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) was developed to predict 30-day mortality for patients with hip fracture. This study aimed to validate the NHFS in a cohort with sufficient statistical power. Methods: Data were extracted from a prospective hip-fracture database (FAMMI). Patients were included between January 1, 2018 and January 11, 2021. All consecutively admitted patients ≥18 years of age with a hip fracture (ie, femoral neck fracture, intertrochanteric fracture, and subtrochanteric fracture) were included. Mann–Whitney’s U values were cal-culated to find potential miscalibration of the NHFS formula. Discrimination evaluation was performed using the concordance statistic as an equivalent to area under the receiver-operating curve. Results: In total, 2,458 patients were included. Mean age was 80±12 years, and 66% were women (n=1,631). Median NHFS was 5 (4–6) and overall 30-day mortality 7.9% (n=195). Overall goodness of fit was tested with Pearson’s ?2 (11.8, df 10; P=0.297). No statistically significant signs of miscalibration were found (Mann–Whitney U, P=0.08). Discrimination was tested with area under the receiver-operating curve, which was 72.1% (95% CI 68.7%– 75.4%). However, observed 30-day mortality in our population of hip-fracture patients was slightly higher than the NHFS prediction. Conclusion: The NHFS seemed to predict 30-day mortality with reasonable accuracy for patients with a hip fracture in a population within the Netherlands.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Rijckevorsel, V. A. J. I. M., Roukema, G. R., Klem, T. M. A. L., Kuijper, T. M., & de Jong, L. (2021). Validation of the nottingham hip fracture score (Nhfs) in patients with hip fracture: A prospective cohort study in the Netherlands. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 16, 1555–1562. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S321287

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free