Abstract
Conor McHugh and Jonathan Way argue that we should put fittingness rather than reasons first because we can provide an account of the evaluative in terms of the normative only if we put fittingness rather than reasons first. I argue that it is no more difficult to provide an account of the evaluative in terms of the normative if we put reasons rather than fittingness first.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Rowland, R. (2017). Reasons or fittingness first? Ethics, 128(1), 212–299. https://doi.org/10.1086/692949
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free