The text and data mining opt-out in Article 4(3) CDSMD: Adequate veto right for rightholders or a suffocating blanket for European artificial intelligence innovations?

5Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

• By introducing Article 4 in Directive 2019/790 (CDSMD), the European Union legislator intended to both encourage innovation and to provide more legal certainty for text and data mining (TDM) activities. That said, it appears that this provision does not strike a fair balance between the interests of rightholders and Artificial Intelligence (AI) developers. • This article argues that Article 4(3) CDSMD does not necessarily strengthen the rightholders’ position whilst potentially hindering the advancement of AI developments in the European Union. It is unclear how the reservation of rights shall be realized in practice. • By imposing transparency obligations on AI system providers, the upcoming Artificial Intelligence Act may however allow rightholders to make more effective use of the opt-out mechanism.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ziaja, G. M. (2024). The text and data mining opt-out in Article 4(3) CDSMD: Adequate veto right for rightholders or a suffocating blanket for European artificial intelligence innovations? Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 19(5), 453–459. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpae025

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free