Patient-controlled analgesia: A comparison with nurse-controlled intravenous opioid infusions

16Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with intravenous pethidine was compared with nurse-controlled pethidine infusions for pain relief in 200 patients after major abdominal or thoracic surgery. Pain, level of sedation, nausea and presence of other adverse effects, in addition to cumulative pethidine requirement, were measured for the first 24 hours after surgery. Both groups were similar for age, weight and type of surgery. There was no significant difference between the quality of analgesia achieved in both groups. The frequency and severity of adverse effects was also similar. The cumulative pethidine dose administered to both groups was identical. It is concluded that nurse-controlled opioid infusions are as effective as PCA and may be used as an alternative to PCA where this is either unavailable or unsuitable.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Murphy, D. F., Graziotti, P., Chalkiadis, G., & McKenna, M. (1994). Patient-controlled analgesia: A comparison with nurse-controlled intravenous opioid infusions. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 22(5), 589–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x9402200516

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free