Being and Becoming in Human-Machine Communication: Core Commitments and Conceptual Foundations of a Trans-Ontological Field

4Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This introduction traces the emergence of Human-Machine Communication (HMC) as a distinct field centered on communication across ontological boundaries. Arguing that HMC is not merely about interacting with machines but about how communicative presence and legitimacy are constituted, the authors introduce the Act–Mean–Relate (AMR) paradigm to conceptualize how machines’ capacity for action, signification, and relation enable communication. HMC challenges human exceptionalism by shifting focus from internal states and categorical differences to symbolic and relational dynamics. It addresses the interpretive labor involved in making machine others intelligible and emphasizes communication as the co-construction of social reality. The article highlights tensions between computational and relational logics and treats design as a third party in communicative triads. In doing so, it frames HMC as a pluralistic, trans-ontological field that advances communication theory while attending to the ethical, epistemic, and material implications of human-machine communication.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Edwards, A., & Etzrodt, K. (2025). Being and Becoming in Human-Machine Communication: Core Commitments and Conceptual Foundations of a Trans-Ontological Field. Human-Machine Communication, 10, 7–30. https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.10.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free