Comparative Review of Environmental Audit Tools for Public Open Spaces from the Perspective of Children’s Activity

6Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Public open spaces are important venues for children’s participation in outdoor activities and social life. This study performs a comparative and qualitative review of the tools that can be used to audit the environments of children-focused public open spaces. The analysis reviews 25 studies involving 11 tools for comparison. The results reveal that (1) the tools were developed in different fields; (2) the tools use two data resources, field investigation and geographic databases; (3) the tool dimensions are diverse, as are the number of items covered, and are generally related to four categories: surrounding environment and accessibility, activity and perceived safety, children’s sports and play opportunities, and aesthetic and comfort of the environment; (4) the reliability of most tools has been verified, with some validity still to be confirmed; (5) there are differences in tool users, settings, and aims. Among the tools, the CPAT and the EAPRS are the most comprehensive. Comparative analysis of the tools provides a reference for studies on children-focused public open spaces and for the development and improvement of corresponding tools in the future.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meng, X., & Wang, M. (2022, October 1). Comparative Review of Environmental Audit Tools for Public Open Spaces from the Perspective of Children’s Activity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013514

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free