Epidemiologic measures and policy formulation: Lessons from potential outcomes

70Citations
Citations of this article
123Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper provides a critique of the common practice in the health-policy literature of focusing on hypothetical outcome removal at the expense of intervention analysis. The paper begins with an introduction to measures of causal effects within the potential-outcomes framework, focusing on underlying conceptual models, definitions and drawbacks of special relevance to policy formulation based on epidemiologic data. It is argued that, for policy purposes, one should analyze intervention effects within a multivariate-outcome framework to capture the impact of major sources of morbidity and mortality. This framework can clarify what is captured and missed by summary measures of population health, and shows that the concept of summary measure can and should be extended to multidimensional indices. © 2005 Greenland; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Greenland, S. (2005, May 27). Epidemiologic measures and policy formulation: Lessons from potential outcomes. Emerging Themes in Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-2-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free