Does LDL-C estimation using Anandaraja's formula give a better agreement with direct LDL-C estimation than the Friedewald's formula?

18Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Estimation of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is crucial in management of coronary artery disease patients. Thoughanumber ofhomogenous assays are available for estimation of LDL-C, use of calculated LDL-C by Friedewald's formula (FF) is common in Indian laboratories for logistic reasons. Recently Anandaraja and colleagues have derived a new formula for calculating LDL-C. This formula needs to be evaluated before it is extensively applied in diagnosis. We measured LDL-C by homogenous method (D-LDL-C) in 515 fasting samples. Friedewald's and Anandaraja's formulas were used for calculation of LDL-C (F-LDL-C and A-LDL-C, respectively). The mean LDL-C levels were 123.3 ± 53.2, 112.4 ± 50.2 and 109.2 ± 49.8 mg/dl for D-LDL-C, F-LDL-C and A-LDL-C, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the results (P > 0.001) obtained by calculation formulas compared to the measured LDL-C. There was underestimation of LDL-C by 10.8 and 14 mg/dl by Friedewald's and Anandaraja's formulas respectively. The Pearson's correlation between F-LDL-C and D-LDL-C was 0.931 and that between A-LDL-C and D-LDL-C was 0.930. Bland-Altman graphs showed a definite agreement between mean and differences of the calculation formulas and direct LDL-C with 95% of values lying with in ±2 SD limits. The mean percentage difference (calculated as {(Calculated LDL-C)-(D-LDL-C)}/D-LDL-C × 100) for F-LDL-C was maximum (-11.6%) at HDL-C C 60 mg/dl and TG levels of 200-300 mg/dl (-10.4%) compared to D-LDL-C. A-LDL-C results gave highest mean percentage difference at total cholesterol concentrations <100 mg/dl (-37.3%) and HDL-C < 40 mg/dl (-17.1%), respectively. The results of our study showed that FF is better in agreement with D-LDL-C than Anandaraja's formula for estimation of LDL-C by calculation though both lead to its underestimation. © 2012 Association of Clinical Biochemists of India.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gupta, S., Verma, M., & Singh, K. (2012). Does LDL-C estimation using Anandaraja’s formula give a better agreement with direct LDL-C estimation than the Friedewald’s formula? Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry, 27(2), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-011-0186-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free