Comparison of Edge Detection Algorithms for Texture Analysis on Copy-Move Forgery Detection Images

2Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Feature extraction in Copy-Move Forgery Detection (CMFD) is crucial to facilitate image forgery analysis. Edge detection is one of the processes to extract specific information from Copy-Move Forgery (CMF) Images. It sensitizes the amount of information in the image and filters out useless ones while preserving the important structural properties in the image. This paper compares five edge detection methods: Robert, Sobel, Prewitt (first Derivative), Laplacian, and Canny edge detectors (second Derivatives). CMFD evaluation datasets images (MICC-F220) are tested with both methods to facilitate comparison. The edge detection operators were implemented with their respective convolution masks. Robert with a 2x2 mask, The Prewitt and Sobel with a 3x3 mask, while Laplacian and canny used adjustable masks. These masks determine the quality of the detected edges. Edges reflect a great-intensity contrast that is either darker or brighter.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Idris, B., Halim, A. A., Abdullah, L. N., & Selimun, M. T. A. (2022). Comparison of Edge Detection Algorithms for Texture Analysis on Copy-Move Forgery Detection Images. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 13(10), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0131021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free