Bounded rationality and voting decisions over 160 years: Voter behavior and increasing complexity in decision-making

33Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Using a quasi-natural voting experiment encompassing a 160-year period (1848-2009) in Switzerland, we investigate whether a higher level of complexity leads to increased reliance on trusted parliamentary representatives. We find that when more referenda are held on the same day, constituents are more likely to refer to parliamentary recommendations when making their decisions. This finding holds true even when we narrow our focus to referenda with a relatively lower voter turnout on days on which more than one referendum is held. We also demonstrate that when constituents face a higher level of complexity, they follow the parliamentary recommendations rather than those of interest groups. "Viewed as a geometric figure, the ant's path is irregular, complex, hard to describe. But its complexity is really a complexity in the surface of the beach, not a complexity in the ant." ( [1 ] p. 51) © 2013 Stadelmann, Torgler.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stadelmann, D., & Torgler, B. (2013). Bounded rationality and voting decisions over 160 years: Voter behavior and increasing complexity in decision-making. PLoS ONE, 8(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084078

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free