Performance management in a collaborative context: the conundrum of hard accountability and sector partnership

1Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Performance management regimes are important tools for government agencies operating across networks of non-profit organizations. This study investigates a regime deployed towards autonomous sport organizations and considers its intended purposes and implementation ‘in practice’. Findings show the regime’s ‘mixed motivational demands’ with from the incompatibility between ‘hard’ rule-based demands for accountability and ‘soft’ practices consistent with learning and partnership. The case suggests the government-sport institutional context is a built-in feature, which cannot be ‘administered out’ by using single-purpose tools for accountability or learning/partnership. The article recommends a tolerance for paradox and organizational hypocrisy for administrators working within the context of networked governance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Macris, L. I., Sam, M. P., & Jackson, S. J. (2026). Performance management in a collaborative context: the conundrum of hard accountability and sector partnership. Public Management Review, 28(1), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2025.2462983

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free