Proficiency testing of skin prick testers as part of a quality assurance system

7Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Skin prick test is an important diagnostic procedure in clinical allergy but documentation of the quality is often missing. Methods: We describe a proficiency system to evaluate staff members in relation to the international recommended reproducibility in terms of coefficient of variation (CV < 40 %) and the linearity (coefficient of regression >0.85) based on blinded octuplicate histamine testing using histamine 3, 10, 30 and 100 mg/ml. Results: Fourteen trained allergy nurses participated in the proficiency testing. More than 95 % of the nurses, generated coefficient of variation less than 40 %, and for around 35 % of testers the CV were below 20 % based on wheal area. Regarding the linearity (coefficient of regression), only two nurses produced tests with a value below 0.85. On the contrary, 79 % of testers demonstrated a coefficient of regression >0.95. Depending on the gentleness of the prick procedure, the inter-nurse variability in wheal area varied more than twofold corresponding to a 10-doubling of histamine concentration. This would never have been detected without using a proficiency testing system. Conclusion: The described histamine testing provides an objective system for the evaluation of basic skin test quality assessment standards especially for documentation in scientific studies.

Figures

  • Fig. 1 The coefficient of variation of 8‑double histamine wheal areas. a depicts the results of 3 mg/ml; b 10 mg/ml; c 30 mg/ml and d 100 mg/ml histamine. The solid line indicates the upper limit (CV < 40 %) for acceptance (4,5) while the dotted line represents the CV of 20 % (highly qualified tester)
  • Fig. 2 Mean wheal area (square millimetres) of the 8 repeats of each of the 4 different concentrations of histamine of the 14 nurses tested. Hista‑ mine concentrations as in Fig. 1
  • Fig. 3 Dose‑response curves of wheal area vs histamine concentra‑ tion of all 14 tested operators. The median slope is 0.217 corre‑ sponding to almost a doubling of the wheal area by increasing the histamine concentration by a factor 10

References Powered by Scopus

Allergy diagnostic testing: An updated practice parameter

660Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The skin prick test - European standards

618Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Practical guide to skin prick tests in allergy to aeroallergens

529Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

IgE allergy diagnostics and other relevant tests in allergy, a World Allergy Organization position paper

334Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Current practice of allergy diagnosis and the potential impact of regulation in Europe

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A paper-based chemiluminescence immunoassay device for rapid and high-throughput detection of allergen-specific IgE

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Malling, H. J., Allesen-Holm, P., Karved, L. S., & Poulsen, L. K. (2016). Proficiency testing of skin prick testers as part of a quality assurance system. Clinical and Translational Allergy, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13601-016-0126-7

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

56%

Researcher 3

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

40%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

20%

Chemistry 2

20%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

20%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 26

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0