Opportunistic sampling from early childhood centres: A substitute for random sampling to determine lead and iron status of pre-school children?

5Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This report compares the results from two sampling strategies used to determine the prevalence of elevated blood lead concentrations and iron status in 12-36 month old children in Central Sydney. The two methods were stratified random sampling using census collector districts and an opportunistic sampling strategy using client registers at Early Childhood Centres (ECCs). The response rates were 75.3% (n = 718 of whom 198 were aged 12-35 months) and 24.1% (n = 304) respectively. The geometric mean blood lead concentrations were 0.40 and 0.34 μmol/L respectively (p = 0.001). The traditional random sampling prevalence survey identified a significantly higher proportion of children with blood lead concentrations greater than 0.48 (OR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.40-0.93) and 0.72 μmol/L (OR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.92) compared to the simpler opportunistic survey. The median plasma ferritin concentration for both studies was 19 μg/L (p = 0.4). The prevalence of iron depletion, iron deficiency and iron deficiency anaemia was not significantly different between the two studies. In conclusion, opportunistic sampling through ECCs does not appear to be a substitute for the traditional random sampling prevalence surveys to determine the prevalence of elevated blood lead concentrations in pre-school children in Central Sydney. However, opportunistic sampling through ECCs may be an appropriate method for monitoring iron status, in particular iron depletion, in pre-school children in Central Sydney.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ranmuthugala, G., Karr, M., Mira, M., Alperstein, G., Causer, J., & Jones, M. (1998). Opportunistic sampling from early childhood centres: A substitute for random sampling to determine lead and iron status of pre-school children? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 22(4), 512–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.1998.tb01424.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free