Abstract
Satellite retrievals of cloud effective radius re are frequently validated using aircraft in situ measurements. Past intercomparisons have found a significant bias toward larger remotely sensed re. Explanations for this bias have focused on retrieval algorithms and large-scale heterogeneity, with in situ measurement uncertainty regarded as a minor factor. We compare Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer re with in situ observations of marine stratocumulus clouds from three aircraft campaigns using a phase Doppler interferometer probe. Retrieved and in situ re typically agree within uncertainty in both nonprecipitating and drizzling conditions with no apparent systematic bias (mean bias of −0.22 μm, mean relative bias 3%). Agreement depends on the choice of in situ probe as well as microphysical context. We demonstrate that probes must adequately characterize the width of the drop size distribution to avoid systematic underestimation of re.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Witte, M. K., Yuan, T., Chuang, P. Y., Platnick, S., Meyer, K. G., Wind, G., & Jonsson, H. H. (2018). MODIS Retrievals of Cloud Effective Radius in Marine Stratocumulus Exhibit No Significant Bias. Geophysical Research Letters, 45(19), 10,656-10,664. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079325
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.