Effect of glass ionomer cement and fluoride varnish on the remineralization of artificial proximal caries in situ

11Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effect of glass ionomer cement (GIC) and fluoride varnish (F-varnish) on artificial proximal caries in situ. Study design: Two 1×3 mm2 enamel slabs, divided into three 1×1 mm2 windows, were prepared from each proximal surface of 18 premolars. Each slab was distributed into a control area, an intact enamel area and a test area. Artificial lesions were created on the control and test areas by immersing in demineralizing solution for 24 hours. The test windows were either applied with GIC or F-varnish and the full slabs inserted into orthodontic brackets as carriers, which were then bonded to the buccal surfaces of the 6 upper posterior teeth of 6 volunteers using non-fluoride dentifrice for 30 days. There was a 1-week washout period in this crossover study. The middle specimens of the three windows were cross-sectioned to analyze the carious lesion area by a polarized light microscope and calculated with Image-Pro plus® software. Results: The average carious lesion area under GIC was significantly less than that under F-varnish (p<0.05). Conclusion: GIC promotes more remineralization of artificial carious lesions on proximal surfaces than F-varnish.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Trairatvorakul, C., Techalertpaisarn, P., Siwawut, S., & Ingprapankorn, A. (2009). Effect of glass ionomer cement and fluoride varnish on the remineralization of artificial proximal caries in situ. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 34(2), 131–134. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.34.2.gr51r535q0607u23

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free