Cause Beneficial or Cause Exploitative? Using Joint Motives to Increase Credibility of Sustainability Efforts

11Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Consumer perceptions of brand motives related to corporate environmental responsibility affect the decisions of both corporations and consumers. Yet prior literature has typically viewed these firm motives as dichotomous, either solely intrinsic or solely extrinsic. The authors argue for a novel approach to positioning sustainability motives, where the brand communicates both intrinsic and extrinsic benefits together, as a joint motive. With a joint motive, a brand can highlight how an effort can benefit both planet and business with a “doing well by doing good” approach. Across five experiments, including a field study on Facebook, this research investigates the positive impact of the joint motive and its ability to enhance the credibility of sustainable initiatives via heightened perceptions of trustworthiness and expertise. Results provide converging evidence for the benefits of presenting a joint motive for sustainability efforts with implications for policy and practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wallach, K. A., & Popovich, D. (2023). Cause Beneficial or Cause Exploitative? Using Joint Motives to Increase Credibility of Sustainability Efforts. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 42(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156221138755

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free