Feasibility of using natural fishbone apatite as a substitute for hydroxyapatite in remediating aqueous heavy metals

82Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Fishbone, a natural, apatite rich substance, was examined for suitability as a substitute for hydroxyapatite in the sequestering of aqueous divalent heavy metal ions. The fishbone exhibited lower metal removal capacity than pure hydroxyapatite, due primarily to its purity (~70% apatite equivalent). In other ways the fishbone behaves in a similar manner as pure hydroxyapatite in the sequestration process. It was observed that it can remove all Pb2+, Cu2+, Cd2+ and Ni2+ to below detectable levels as measured by inductively coupled plasma atomic absorption, and the rate of reaction with either Zn2+, Ni2+, or Pb2+ was also found to be similar to hydroxyapatite. Also, a two level, three variable full factorial design was performed for the Pb/apatite reaction and both apatites performed similarly. The main difference, besides capacity, was on exposure to high (2.4 mM) Pb concentrations. The fishbone removed less of the Pb2+ than capacity correction predicted. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Admassu, W., & Breese, T. (1999). Feasibility of using natural fishbone apatite as a substitute for hydroxyapatite in remediating aqueous heavy metals. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 69(2), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00102-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free