Geomorphological analysis and prioritization of sub-watersheds using Snyder’s synthetic unit hydrograph method

28Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The present study makes an attempt to prioritize sub-watersheds based on Snyder’s synthetic unit hydrograph method. Snyder’s method of synthetic unit hydrograph calculates peak discharge and lag time of the unit hydrograph for each sub-watersheds. Compound values of ranking are calculated from assigned rankings to parameters, viz. peak discharge and lag time. Depending on the range of the compound values sub-watersheds are classified as high, medium and low soil-erosive sub-watersheds. The priorities obtained from Snyder’s synthetic unit hydrograph method are compared with the methods of morphometric analysis and land use/land cover analysis. On comparison of priorities for Dangri River watershed, Panchkula District, Haryana (India), among the three methods it was found that the sub-watershed (SW1) has the same priority. Among all the three methods, Snyder’s synthetic unit hydrograph is a better method, as it is easier to use and less data intensive.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Singh, N., & Singh, K. K. (2017). Geomorphological analysis and prioritization of sub-watersheds using Snyder’s synthetic unit hydrograph method. Applied Water Science, 7(1), 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-014-0243-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free