Diagnosis and treatment of prosthetic aortic graft infections: Confusion and inconsistency in the absence of evidence or consensus

154Citations
Citations of this article
92Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Prosthetic aortic graft infections represent a major diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Although a combination of clinical assessment, imaging and microbiological investigations is usually helpful, there are no agreed criteria to confirm a diagnosis. Potential pathogens isolated from superficial specimens may be misleading but influence the choice of antimicrobial agents. Removal of the infected material is strongly recommended. However, this is not always possible in the very debilitated or clinically unstable patient. The choice of which antimicrobial agents to administer as empirical or definitive therapy and the duration of treatment are unclear. A multi-disciplinary group is required to offer guidance, based on what evidence there is, and to provide expert consensus (as is the case for infective endocarditis) to optimize the management of these difficult infections. © The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

FitzGerald, S. F., Kelly, C., & Humphreys, H. (2005, December). Diagnosis and treatment of prosthetic aortic graft infections: Confusion and inconsistency in the absence of evidence or consensus. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dki382

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free