The policy challenges of peer review: Managing bias, conflict of interests and interdisciplinary assessments

125Citations
Citations of this article
89Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Characteristics and challenges of peer review are elucidated from three different perspectives: a social dynamics perspective defining peer review as an important control mechanism in the research community; an uncertainty perspective focusing on the inherent uncertainty in judging research quality: and an organisational perspective focusing on the effects of different ways of organising peer review. Findings from a broad set of empirical studies are used. Peer review often has some conservative and risk-minimising aspects, which may disfavour interdisciplinary and non-conventional research. When the aim is to actively promote interdisciplinary or other kinds of non-conventional research, the involved peer-review system consequently needs to be adjusted to a more risk-taking mode. © Beech Tree Publishing 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Langfeldt, L. (2006, April). The policy challenges of peer review: Managing bias, conflict of interests and interdisciplinary assessments. Research Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154406781776039

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free