Rules Versus Discretion

  • Lassa K
  • Bachri S
  • Patittingi F
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Under a discretionary regime the monetary authority makes no commitments about future money and prices. Then, if surprise inflation conveys economic benefits and if people form expectations rationally, it turns out that the equilibrium involves high and variable monetary growth and inflation. Moreover, since the high rate of inflation is anticipated there are no benefits from inflation surprises. The implementation of an enforced rule can lower the mean rate of inflation while delivering the same average amount of inflation surprises, namely zero. Using these results as a background, the paper discusses alternative monetary rules, including quantity versus price rules and a prescription for stablilizing nominal GNP. This discussion touches on the distinction between positive and normative economics, which leads to a pessimistic appraisal of the role for economists' policy advice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lassa, K., Bachri, S., Patittingi, F., & Riza, M. (2022). Rules Versus Discretion. In Proceedings of the 2nd Riau Annual Meeting on Law and Social Sciences (RAMLAS 2021) (Vol. 659). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220406.003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free