Provider reported challenges with completing death certificates: A focus group study demonstrating potential sources of error

3Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives To characterize the experiences of providers in completing the cause of death section on death certificates, with particular reference to deaths in people who have cancer. Methods Focus groups were conducted until thematic saturation was reached, resulting in four groups over three months. Participants were from a variety of specialties and levels and types of training. Focus groups were recorded and transcribed verbatim and analyzed using constant comparison analysis. Results Three types of challenges to case classification were identified. 1) Infrastructural and procedural challenges encountered when completing death certificates, including the rigid structure of the form, lack of training in its completion, and lack of real-time feedback. 2) Clinical uncertainty and the varied approaches providers take to determine the cause of death based on their perception of the purpose of the death certificate. 3) Choosing cause of death in decedents with a history of cancer. Conclusions There are specific and substantial challenges in the death certification process that lead to errors in documenting the cause of death, but many of these challenges could be addressed with structural change to the forms or mechanism of training. Using these data to inform change could improve the death certification process and reliability of this data.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morgan, A., Andrew, T., Guerra, S. M. A., Luna, V., Davies, L., & Rees, J. R. (2022). Provider reported challenges with completing death certificates: A focus group study demonstrating potential sources of error. PLoS ONE, 17(5 May). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268566

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 3

43%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

43%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

29%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

14%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free