Synthetic biology regulation in Europe: containment, release and beyond

16Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

While synthetic biology is hoped to hold promise and potential to address pressing global challenges, the issue of regulation is an under-appreciated challenge. Particularly in Europe, the regulatory frameworks involved are rooted in historical concepts based on containment and release. Through a series of case studies including a field-use biosensor intended to detect arsenic in well water in Nepal and Bangladesh, and insects engineered for sterility, we explore the implications that this regulatory and conceptual divide has had on the deployment of synthetic biology projects in different national contexts. We then consider some of the broader impacts that regulation can have on the development of synthetic biology as a field, not only in Europe but also globally, with a particular emphasis on low- and middle-income countries. We propose that future regulatory adaptability would be increased by moving away from a containment and release dichotomy and toward a more comprehensive assessment that accounts for the possibility of varying degrees of ‘contained release’.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sundaram, L. S., Ajioka, J. W., & Molloy, J. C. (2023). Synthetic biology regulation in Europe: containment, release and beyond. Synthetic Biology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/synbio/ysad009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free