Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Where are we?

14Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Peritoneal surface malignancies are generally associated with poor prognosis. In daily clinical routine, systemic chemotherapy is still considered the only reasonable therapy despite of encouraging results of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) along with intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy (HIPEC). The Achilles heel of CRS and HIPEC is appropriate patient selection and precise surgical technique preventing patients from excessive morbidity and mortality. Given these findings, new concepts of second look surgery for high risk patients allow detection of peritoneal spread ahead of clinical symptoms or presence of peritoneal masses reducing perioperative morbidity. In addition, personalized intraperitoneal chemotherapy might further improve outcome by appreciating individual tumor biology. These days, every physician should be aware of CRS and HIPEC for treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies. Since there is now sufficient data for the superiority of CRS and HIPEC to systemic chemotherapy in selected patients, our next goal should be providing this strategy with minimal morbidity and mortality even in the presence of higher tumor load. © 2012 Baishideng. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Königsrainer, I., & Beckert, S. (2012). Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Where are we? World Journal of Gastroenterology, 18(38), 5317–5320. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i38.5317

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free