Abstract
Locke & Latham (1990a) report that specific, difficult goals lead to better performance than "do-your-best" instructions, whether the goals are self-set or are set by an external source. However, in Experiment I, as well as in previous research (White, Kjelgaard, & Harkins, 1995), we did not find self-set goal effects. A meta-analysis showed that self-set goal effects can be produced if two conditions are met: Prior to setting their goals, participants take part in a pretest that is equal in duration to the experimental task; and the experimenter has access to the participants' goals and the performances. Experiment 2 confirmed these meta-analytic findings by showing that when these two conditions were met, goals stringent enough to produce the effects were set, and goal-setting effects were obtained.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Harkins, S. G., & Lowe, M. D. (2000). The effects of self-set goals on task performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02303.x
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.