Abstract
In this paper, an application of heuristic vs. meta-heuristic approaches to the design of an office building is presented. The building was first optimized by a heuristic approach based on the designers' expertise, prior experiences and intuitions with the use of a whole building simulation tool, EnergyPlus. Then, a meta-heuristic approach was completed in MATLAB platform where EnergyPlus and Genetic Algorithm (GA) were coupled. M-script files were developed to automate execution of EnergyPlus simulation runs (reading output files and overwriting input files of EnergyPlus) in integration to GA. Based on a comparison between the heuristic and the meta-heuristic approach, it is shown that GA performs much better in finding a global optimum even under a constrained search space than the heuristic approach. The heuristic approach has advantages, such as reflection of a design context in decision-making and fast communication between stakeholders.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Suh, W. J., & Park, C. S. (2017). Heuristic vs. meta-heuristic optimal energy design for an office building. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040508
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.