Heuristic vs. meta-heuristic optimal energy design for an office building

3Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, an application of heuristic vs. meta-heuristic approaches to the design of an office building is presented. The building was first optimized by a heuristic approach based on the designers' expertise, prior experiences and intuitions with the use of a whole building simulation tool, EnergyPlus. Then, a meta-heuristic approach was completed in MATLAB platform where EnergyPlus and Genetic Algorithm (GA) were coupled. M-script files were developed to automate execution of EnergyPlus simulation runs (reading output files and overwriting input files of EnergyPlus) in integration to GA. Based on a comparison between the heuristic and the meta-heuristic approach, it is shown that GA performs much better in finding a global optimum even under a constrained search space than the heuristic approach. The heuristic approach has advantages, such as reflection of a design context in decision-making and fast communication between stakeholders.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Suh, W. J., & Park, C. S. (2017). Heuristic vs. meta-heuristic optimal energy design for an office building. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040508

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free