Is early primary repair for correction of tetralogy of Fallot comparable to surgery after 6 months of age?

31Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether early primary repair for correction of tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) resulted in better outcomes than surgery after 6 months of age. Altogether 650 relevant papers were identified using the below mentioned search, eight papers represented the best evidence to answer the specific question. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses were tabulated. We conclude that early primary repair of TOF has been shown to be comparable to later repair, with several retrospective series concluding that there is no increase in mortality with children under 6 months of age. Freedom from reintervention has also been shown to be similar irrespective of the age primary repair is undertaken. However, it has been observed that length of intensive care unit stay, period of mechanical ventilation and the need for inotropes is increased in patients undergoing primary repair at <3 months of age.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vohra, H. A., Adamson, L., & Haw, M. P. (2008). Is early primary repair for correction of tetralogy of Fallot comparable to surgery after 6 months of age? Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 7(4), 698–701. https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2008.180083

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free