In Search of Ontological Security: Why the Anglo-American Special Relationship Endures

4Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The period following World War II (WWII) marked a significant turning point in Britain's global standing, characterized by the loss of its empire and the existential anxiety regarding its new role on the world stage. Dean Acheson's famous quote, "Britain has lost an empire and not yet found a role,"poignantly captures the sense of diminishing power and identity crisis experienced by the Kingdom since 1945. Along with the consequences of WWII, the process of decolonization, coupled with events such as the Suez Crisis, further confirmed Britain's declining position in the international system, disrupting its established narrative of global power and leaving it in a state of ontological insecurity. This paper, focusing on ontological security studies in international relations, explores the connection between Britain's ontological insecurity in the new global order after WWII, and the Anglo-American special relationship (AASR) as a response to these anxieties. In this context, the suggested theoretical framework promises to address the concepts of narrative identity and existential anxiety and their respective contributions to understanding the underlying factors in explaining the emergence and stability of the AASR.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mohammadpour, S., & Saeidabadi, M. R. (2023). In Search of Ontological Security: Why the Anglo-American Special Relationship Endures. Global Studies Quarterly, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksad040

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free