Labor-saving agricultural mechanization services and the technical efficiency in agricultural production: evidence from Chinese rural households

12Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: In the context of accelerating industrialization and urbanization, China’s agricultural production faces challenges such as labor shortages and fragmented land supply. Labor-saving agricultural mechanization services (LAMS) have emerged as a scalable factor innovation to address such issues. However, the efficiency implications and moderating factors of LAMS adoption remain insufficiently understood. Methods: Using 2019 cross-sectional survey data from 1,519 medium indica rice growers in China, this study investigates the impact of LAMS adoption on technical efficiency (TE) using a stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) approach. To address endogeneity concerns, a two-stage least squares (2SLS) instrumental variable strategy is employed. Moderating effect models further identify causal effects of market- and policy-based factors. Results: The results show that LAMS adoption significantly improves technical efficiency. Market factors—measured by self-owned machinery—exhibit a substitution effect with LAMS, while policy factors—proxied by high-standard farmland construction (HSFC)—demonstrate complementary effects. Robustness checks confirm the validity of these effects across income groups. Discussion: The findings suggest that service-based mechanization can alleviate structural constraints such as land fragmentation and labor scarcity. LAMS offer a viable pathway to enhance smallholder productivity. These insights provide valuable policy implications for agricultural transformation in land-constrained developing economies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yangchen, D. C., Yang, Q., & Hong, M. (2025). Labor-saving agricultural mechanization services and the technical efficiency in agricultural production: evidence from Chinese rural households. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1600375

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free