Immune responses after 2 versus 3 doses of hpv vaccination up to 41/2 years after vaccination: an observational study among Dutch routinely vaccinated girls

22Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. In 2014 the Netherlands switched from 3 to 2 doses for routine vaccination with the prophylactic bivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. The current study explored whether antibody responses are noninferior after 2 versus 3 doses in girls. Methods. Girls vaccinated at 12 years of age with 2 (at 0 and 6 months) or 3 doses (at 0, 1, and 6 months) of the bivalent HPV vaccine were identified in the vaccination registration system. Type-specific antibody concentrations and avidity against HPV-16/18/31/33/45/52/58 were assessed. Analyses were stratified for time since the first dose (0-2, 2-3, 3-4, or 4-41/2 years). Noninferiority (margin, 0.5) of the 2- versus the 3-dose schedule in girls was examined. Results. Geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) for vaccine types were only noninferior for 2 versus 3 doses for HPV-18 (at 2-3 years after the first dose; GMC ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, .57-1.38) For vaccine types and cross-protective types (HPV- 16/18/31/33/45), the avidity index was noninferior for the 2-dose compared with the 3-dose schedule, except for HPV-31 at 4-41/2 years after the first dose and HPV-33 at 3-4 and 4-41/2 years. Conclusions. GMCs for HPV-16/18 were not noninferior for 2 versus 3 doses, except for HPV-18 (at 2-3 years after first dose). However, antibody avidity for these types showed noninferiority, independent of concentrations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Donken, R., Schurink-Van’t Klooster, T. M., Schepp, R. M., Van Der Klis, F. R. M., Knol, M. J., Meijer, C. J. L. M., & De Melker, H. E. (2017). Immune responses after 2 versus 3 doses of hpv vaccination up to 41/2 years after vaccination: an observational study among Dutch routinely vaccinated girls. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 215(3), 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiw588

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free