Pervasive deformation of an oceanic plate and relationship to large > Mw 8 intraplate earthquakes: The northern Wharton Basin, Indian Ocean

30Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Large-magnitude intraplate earthquakes within the ocean basins are not well understood. The Mw 8.6 and Mw 8.2 strike-slip intraplate earthquakes on 11 April 2012, while clearly occurring in the equatorial Indian Ocean diffuse plate boundary zone, are a case in point, with disagreement on the nature of the focal mechanisms and the faults that ruptured. We use bathymetric and seismic reflection data from the rupture area of the earthquakes in the northern Wharton Basin to demonstrate pervasive brittle deformation between the Ninetyeast Ridge and the Sunda subduction zone. In addition to evidence of recent strike-slip deformation along approximately north-south-trending fossil fracture zones, we identify a new type of deformation structure in the Indian Ocean: conjugate Riedel shears limited to the sediment section and oriented oblique to the north-south fracture zones. The Riedel shears developed in the Miocene, at a similar time to the onset of diffuse deformation in the central Indian Ocean. However, left-lateral strike-slip reactivation of existing fracture zones started earlier, in the Paleocene to early Eocene, and compartmentalizes the Wharton Basin. Modeled rupture during the 11 April 2012 intraplate earthquakes is consistent with the location of two reactivated, closely spaced, approximately north-south-trending fracture zones. However, we find no evidence for WNW-ESE-trending faults in the shallow crust, which is at variance with most of the earthquake fault models.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Geersen, J., Bull, J. M., McNeill, L. C., Henstock, T. J., Gaedicke, C., Chamot-Rooke, N., & Delescluse, M. (2015). Pervasive deformation of an oceanic plate and relationship to large > Mw 8 intraplate earthquakes: The northern Wharton Basin, Indian Ocean. Geology, 43(4), 359–362. https://doi.org/10.1130/G36446.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free