The prevalence of bacterial infection in acute rhinosinusitis: A systematic review and meta-Analysis

50Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis: To systematically assess the prevalence of bacterial infection in adults with acute rhinosinusitis (ARS). Methods: Electronic databases were systematically searched for relevant studies published up to June 2012. Results: Twenty-nine articles, evaluating a total of 9,595 patients with a clinical diagnosis of ARS, were included in the study. Of these, 14 (48%) studies required radiographic confirmation of sinusitis, one study (3%) required evidence of purulence, 10 studies (35%) required both for inclusion in the study population, and four studies (14%) required neither. The random effects model estimate of prevalence of bacterial growth on all cultures was 53.7% (CI 48.4%-59.0%), ranging from 52.5% (CI 46.7%-58.3%) in studies requiring radiographic confirmation of sinusitis to 61.1% (CI 54.0%-68.1%) in studies requiring neither radiographic evidence nor purulence on exam. Studies that obtained cultures from antral swab had a prevalence of bacterial growth of 61.0% (CI 54.7%-67.2%), whereas those utilizing endoscopic meatal sampling had a prevalence of 32.9% (CI 19.0%-46.8%). Conclusions: Few studies evaluate the recovery of bacteria via culture in adults with a diagnosis of ABRS or ARS based on clinical criteria alone. With radiographic and/or endoscopic confirmation, antral puncture and endoscopically guided cultures produce positive bacterial cultures in approximately one-half of patients. Opportunities exist to improve diagnostic accuracy for bacterial infection in ARS. © 2014 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, S. S., Ference, E. H., Evans, C. T., Tan, B. K., Kern, R. C., & Chandra, R. K. (2015). The prevalence of bacterial infection in acute rhinosinusitis: A systematic review and meta-Analysis. In Laryngoscope (Vol. 125, pp. 57–69). John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24709

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free