Abstract
Objectives/Hypothesis: To systematically assess the prevalence of bacterial infection in adults with acute rhinosinusitis (ARS). Methods: Electronic databases were systematically searched for relevant studies published up to June 2012. Results: Twenty-nine articles, evaluating a total of 9,595 patients with a clinical diagnosis of ARS, were included in the study. Of these, 14 (48%) studies required radiographic confirmation of sinusitis, one study (3%) required evidence of purulence, 10 studies (35%) required both for inclusion in the study population, and four studies (14%) required neither. The random effects model estimate of prevalence of bacterial growth on all cultures was 53.7% (CI 48.4%-59.0%), ranging from 52.5% (CI 46.7%-58.3%) in studies requiring radiographic confirmation of sinusitis to 61.1% (CI 54.0%-68.1%) in studies requiring neither radiographic evidence nor purulence on exam. Studies that obtained cultures from antral swab had a prevalence of bacterial growth of 61.0% (CI 54.7%-67.2%), whereas those utilizing endoscopic meatal sampling had a prevalence of 32.9% (CI 19.0%-46.8%). Conclusions: Few studies evaluate the recovery of bacteria via culture in adults with a diagnosis of ABRS or ARS based on clinical criteria alone. With radiographic and/or endoscopic confirmation, antral puncture and endoscopically guided cultures produce positive bacterial cultures in approximately one-half of patients. Opportunities exist to improve diagnostic accuracy for bacterial infection in ARS. © 2014 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Smith, S. S., Ference, E. H., Evans, C. T., Tan, B. K., Kern, R. C., & Chandra, R. K. (2015). The prevalence of bacterial infection in acute rhinosinusitis: A systematic review and meta-Analysis. In Laryngoscope (Vol. 125, pp. 57–69). John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24709
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.