Critical issues in EHR implementation: Provider and vendor perspectives

20Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Stakeholders, both internal and external, can have differing and sometimes conflicting perspectives and priorities even though each has a vested interest in organizational success. Using the lens of stakeholder theory, we examine the differing views of stakeholders (namely, medical providers and vendors) in the implementation of electronic health record (EHR) systems. The implementation process itself can be broken down into three phases: preimplementation, during implementation, and post-implementation. After determining a comprehensive set of seventeen key issues relevant to each phase, we discovered that there are significant differences in the perceptions of EHR vendors and their customers in terms of which issues in each phase of an EHR implementation are most important. These findings indicate that vendors tend to underestimate the role of nursing staff and that providers tend to underestimate the role of security. Both groups, however, agree that physician support throughout the implementation is essential for success.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Palvia, P., Jacks, T., & Brown, W. (2015). Critical issues in EHR implementation: Provider and vendor perspectives. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 36, 707–725. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.03636

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free