Geometric versus anemometric surface roughness for a shallow accumulating snowpack

8Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

When applied to a snow-covered surface, aerodynamic roughness length, z 0 , is typically considered as a static parameter within energy balance equations. However, field observations show that z 0 changes spatially and temporally, and thus z 0 incorporated as a dynamic parameter may greatly improve models. To evaluate methods for characterizing snow surface roughness, we compared concurrent estimates of z 0 based on (1) terrestrial light detection and ranging derived surface geometry of the snowpack surface (geometric, z 0G ) and (2) vertical wind profile measurements (anemometric, z 0A ). The value of z 0G was computed from Lettau’s equation and underestimated z 0A but compared well when scaled by a factor of 2.34. The Counihan method for computing z 0G was found to be unsuitable for estimating z 0 on a snow surface. During snowpack accumulation in early winter, z 0 varied as a function of the snow-covered area (SCA). Our results show that as the SCA increases, z 0 decreases, indicating there is a topographic influence on this relation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sanow, J. E., Fassnacht, S. R., Kamin, D. J., Sexstone, G. A., Bauerle, W. L., & Oprea, I. (2018). Geometric versus anemometric surface roughness for a shallow accumulating snowpack. Geosciences (Switzerland), 8(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8120463

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free