Efficacy, safety, and in-hospital outcomes of subcutaneous versus transvenous implantable defibrillator therapy: A meta-analysis and systematic review

12Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Lead-related complication is an important drawback of trans-venous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (TVICD). The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) was developed to overcome ICD lead associated complications; however, whether the S-ICD confers enhanced clinical benefits compared with TV-ICD remains unclear. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess TV-ICD and S-ICD for safety, efficacy, and in-hospital outcomes in the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients not requiring pacing. Methods: The Medline, PubMed, EmBase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies comparing TV-ICD and SICD. Results: A total of 9 eligible studies, including 5 propensity-matched case-control, 3 retrospective, and 1 cross-sectional studies were identified, assessing 7361 patients in all. Pool analyses demonstrated that SICD were associated with lower lead-related complication rates [odds ratio (OR)=0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.33; I2=0%], and S-ICD was more beneficial in terms of reducing ICD shocks [OR=0.48; 95% CI 0.32-0.72, I2=4%]. In addition, the patients administered S-ICD tend to have shorter length of hospital stay after implantation (SMD=-0.06; 95% CI -0.11 to 0.00, I2=0%) and reduce total complication rates (OR= 0.72; 95% CI 0.50-1.03; I2=18%), non-decreased quality of life (QoL). Moreover, both devices appeared to perform equally well with respect to infection rate and death. Conclusions: Available overall data suggested that S-ICD is associated with reducing lead-related complications, ICD shocks. In addition, S-ICD has tendency to shorten hospitalization and reduce total complications, although the difference is no significant. Equivalent death rate, infection, and QoL were found between 2 groups. Therefore, S-ICD could be considered an alternative approach to TV-ICD in appropriate patients for SCD prevention.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, C. F., Jin, C. L., Liu, M. J., & Xu, Y. Z. (2019). Efficacy, safety, and in-hospital outcomes of subcutaneous versus transvenous implantable defibrillator therapy: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Medicine (United States). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015490

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free