Background: Lead-related complication is an important drawback of trans-venous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (TVICD). The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) was developed to overcome ICD lead associated complications; however, whether the S-ICD confers enhanced clinical benefits compared with TV-ICD remains unclear. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess TV-ICD and S-ICD for safety, efficacy, and in-hospital outcomes in the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients not requiring pacing. Methods: The Medline, PubMed, EmBase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies comparing TV-ICD and SICD. Results: A total of 9 eligible studies, including 5 propensity-matched case-control, 3 retrospective, and 1 cross-sectional studies were identified, assessing 7361 patients in all. Pool analyses demonstrated that SICD were associated with lower lead-related complication rates [odds ratio (OR)=0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.33; I2=0%], and S-ICD was more beneficial in terms of reducing ICD shocks [OR=0.48; 95% CI 0.32-0.72, I2=4%]. In addition, the patients administered S-ICD tend to have shorter length of hospital stay after implantation (SMD=-0.06; 95% CI -0.11 to 0.00, I2=0%) and reduce total complication rates (OR= 0.72; 95% CI 0.50-1.03; I2=18%), non-decreased quality of life (QoL). Moreover, both devices appeared to perform equally well with respect to infection rate and death. Conclusions: Available overall data suggested that S-ICD is associated with reducing lead-related complications, ICD shocks. In addition, S-ICD has tendency to shorten hospitalization and reduce total complications, although the difference is no significant. Equivalent death rate, infection, and QoL were found between 2 groups. Therefore, S-ICD could be considered an alternative approach to TV-ICD in appropriate patients for SCD prevention.
CITATION STYLE
Chen, C. F., Jin, C. L., Liu, M. J., & Xu, Y. Z. (2019). Efficacy, safety, and in-hospital outcomes of subcutaneous versus transvenous implantable defibrillator therapy: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Medicine (United States). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015490
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.