Why are natural sounds detected faster than pips?

  • Suied C
  • Susini P
  • McAdams S
  • et al.
17Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Simple reaction times (RTs) were used to measure differences in processing time between natural animal sounds and artificial sounds. When the artificial stimuli were sequences of short tone pulses, the animal sounds were detected faster than the artificial sounds. The animal sounds were then compared with acoustically modified versions (white noise modulated by the temporal envelope of the animal sounds). No differences in RTs were observed between the animal sounds and their modified counterparts. These results show that the fast detection observed for natural sounds, in the present task, could be explained by their acoustic properties.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Suied, C., Susini, P., McAdams, S., & Patterson, R. D. (2010). Why are natural sounds detected faster than pips? The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(3), EL105–EL110. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3310196

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free