Abstract
The idea of phenotypic novelty appears throughout the evolutionary literature. Novelties have been defined so broadly as to make the term meaningless and so narrowly as to apply only to a limited number of spectacular structures. Here I examine some of the available definitions of phenotypic novelty and argue that the modern synthesis is ill equipped at explaining novelties. I then discuss three frameworks that may help biologists get a better insight of how novelties arise during evolution but warn that these frameworks should be considered in addition to, and not as potential substitutes of, the modern synthesis. Copyright 2008 by the Philosophy of Science Association. All rights reserved.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Pigliucci, M. (2008). What, if anything, is an evolutionary novelty? In Philosophy of Science (Vol. 75, pp. 887–898). https://doi.org/10.1086/594532
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.