Citizenship, Identity, and Veiling: Interrogating the Limits of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights in Cases Involving the Religious Dress of Muslim Women

4Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In 2021, the debate about the spaces in which Europe's Muslim citizens should be permitted to wear religious veils was reanimated by the introduction of new prohibitions introduced in Switzerland and France, and the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in joined cases C-804/18 and C-341/19. This article examines the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights concerning veiling. We argue that veil bans reduce the ability of Muslim women to actualize themselves as citizens by limiting their capacity to develop their identity through autonomous action. As such, we argue, the right ultimately at stake - which should protect rights in respect of veiling - is the right to a private life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and judicial and popular conceptions of veiling should be reoriented to accommodate this view. Doing so, we argue, highlights the full range of functions that veiling implicates - including religious but also secular identarian concerns and exposes how a usually expansive right has been curtailed in cases involving veiling.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Costello, R. Á., & Ahmed, S. (2023). Citizenship, Identity, and Veiling: Interrogating the Limits of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights in Cases Involving the Religious Dress of Muslim Women. Journal of Law and Religion, 38(1), 81–107. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2022.58

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free