Abstract
Purpose: Brazil is the third country globally in dialysis patients. Little is known about the impact of the type of health insurance on the outcome of these patients after COVID-19. Methods: We analyzed comorbidities, sociodemographic factors, and dialysis-related parameters from a retrospective cohort study of 1866 Brazilian chronic hemodialysis patients with COVID-19 from Feb 2020–July 2021. We evaluated the influence of health insurance (private vs. public) on the intensive care unit admission and 90 day fatality risk. Results: From 1866 hemodialysis patients, 455 (24%) were admitted to the intensive care unit, and 350 (19%) died. The mean age was 57.5 years, 88% had public health insurance. Crude case-fatality rate was not different between groups (private vs. public risk ratio 1.11; 95% CI 0.82–1.52, p = 0.498). In fully adjusted multivariate models, patients with private health insurance did not have a higher chance to be admitted to an intensive care unit (odds ratio 0.97; 95% CI 0.63–1.50, p = 0.888), but they presented a lower death risk (hazard ratio 0.56; 95% CI 0.37–0.85, p = 0.006). Conclusion: The type of health insurance did not influence the access of hemodialysis patients with COVID-19 to an intensive care unit, but patients with private health insurance had a lower mortality risk.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
do Nascimento Lima, H., Nerbass, F. B., Neto, O. M. V., Sesso, R., Lugon, J. R., Manfrim, R. F., … Fraxino, P. H. (2023). Chronic hemodialysis patients with COVID-19 cared for by the public health system have higher mortality than those treated in private facilities: analysis of the Brazilian dialysis registry. International Urology and Nephrology, 55(2), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-022-03289-z
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.