Secret Language as a “Weapon of Defense”: The Problem of Opacity in Italian Colonial Libya

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article examines the role of referential directness and community emblematization in the documentation of Libyan sign processes construed by Italian colonial ethnographers as secretive. I examine the key texts on these practices to show that colonial ethnographers metasemiotically framed the so-called argots of Libya in terms of what was understood to be their occulting function of hiding one’s intentions and their anti-language function of opposing established society. I show that Italian colonial-ethnological preoccupations with clarity and moral unity were articulated against the discursive background of French colonial ethnology of Algeria as well as Italian racist criminology anchored in the metaphor of relative opacity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

La Mattina, N. A. (2022). Secret Language as a “Weapon of Defense”: The Problem of Opacity in Italian Colonial Libya. Signs and Society, 10(2), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1086/718898

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free