Standardized Assessment Use in Stroke Rehabilitation: Findings From a Cross-Sectional Survey of Occupational Therapy Practitioners

Abstract

Standardized outcome measures, like the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), support stroke rehabilitation; however, occupational therapy practitioners report minimal use due to limited knowledge, time, and administrative support. The objective of this study was to examine practitioners’ perceived acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of using the FMA-UE, attitudes toward standardized outcome measures, and strategies to support use. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure, Intervention Appropriateness Measure, Feasibility of Intervention Measure, and Evidence-Based Practice Attitudes Scale. Spearman correlations assessed relationships among variables. Practitioners (n = 102) perceived the FMA-UE as acceptable, appropriate, and feasible. Acceptability (r = .34, p < .001), appropriateness (r = .35, p < .001), and feasibility (r = .32, p < .01) were significantly correlated with openness to FMA-UE use. Despite positive perceptions of the FMA-UE and outcome measures, consistent implementation remains limited. Further research should examine strategies to enhance use.