Challenges and Tradeoffs of “Good” Teaching: The Pursuit of Multiple Educational Outcomes

6Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The pursuit of multiple educational outcomes makes teaching a complex craft subject to potential conflicts and competing commitments. Using a data set in which teachers were randomly assigned to classes paired with videotaped lessons, we both document and unpack such a tradeoff. Upper-elementary teachers who excel at raising students’ math test scores often are less successful at improving student-reported engagement in class (and vice versa). Furthermore, teaching practices that improve test scores (e.g., cognitively demanding content) can simultaneously decrease engagement. At the same time, paired quantitative and qualitative analyses reveal two areas of practice that support both outcomes: active mathematics with opportunities for hands-on participation, physical movement, and peer interaction; and established routines and procedures to proactively organize the classroom. In addition to guiding practice-based teacher education, our sequential, explanatory mixed-methods analysis can serve as a model for rigorously studying and identifying dimensions of “good” teaching that promote multidimensional student development.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blazar, D., & Pollard, C. (2023). Challenges and Tradeoffs of “Good” Teaching: The Pursuit of Multiple Educational Outcomes. Journal of Teacher Education, 74(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871231155830

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free