Grading and Prognostication of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Pancreas: A Comparison Study of Ki67 and PHH3

18Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) is currently based on mitotic rate and Ki67 proliferation index. Phosphohistone-H3 (PHH3) is an effective marker for mitosis that has been proposed to use in grading various NETs. It remains unclear which method more accurately predicts grade and clinical outcome. Cases of pNET were evaluated using immunohistochemical stains for Ki67 and PHH3. In addition, each case was evaluated for necrosis, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion and compared with stage. R project statistical analysis was used for comparisons. Sixty-three cases were included in the study including 29 males and 34 females (M:F 0.9) with a median age of 59 years (ranging 34–84). There was not a significant discrepancy in the stratification of tumor grades for Ki67 and PHH3. PHH3 significantly predicted lymph node metastasis (p=0.041). Necrosis correlated with overall survival (p=0.017). The results suggest that PHH3 is an effective marker for determining mitotic activity and can be used alternative to Ki67. In addition, necrosis may be included in the reporting of pNET as it may play a prognostic role. Larger scale studies are warranted to understand the biology and behavior of these tumors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tracht, J., Zhang, K., & Peker, D. (2017). Grading and Prognostication of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Pancreas: A Comparison Study of Ki67 and PHH3. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 65(7), 399–405. https://doi.org/10.1369/0022155417708186

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free