Clinical pathways: A catalyst for the adoption of hypofractionation for early-stage breast cancer

27Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: Hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HF-WBI) remains underutilized in the United States despite support by multiple clinical trials. We evaluated the success of iterative modifications of our breast cancer clinical pathway on the adoption of HF-WBI in a large, integrated radiation oncology network. Methods and Materials: The breast clinical pathway was modified in January 2011 (Amendment 1) to recommend HF-WBI as the first option for women ≥70 of age with stages 0 to IIA, while maintaining conventional fractionation (CF) as a pathwayconcordant secondary option. In January 2013 (Amendment 2), the pathway's HF-WBI recommendation was extended to women ≥50 years of age. In January 2014 (Amendment 3), the pathway mandated HF-WBI as the only pathwayconcordant option in women ≥50 years of age, and all pathway-discordant plans were subject to peer review and justification. Women ≥50 years of age with ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive breast cancer who underwent breast conserving surgery and adjuvant WBI were included in this analysis. Results: We identified 5112 patients from 2009 to 2014 who met inclusion criteria. From 2009 to 2012, the overall HF-WBI use rate was 8.3%. Following Amendments 2 and 3 (2013 and 2014, respectively), HF-WBI use significantly increased to 21.8% (17.3% in the community, 39.7% at academic sites) and 76.7% (75.5% in the community, 81.4% at academic sites), respectively (P 75%. In contrast to passive guidelines, clinical pathways serve as active tools to promote current best practices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chapman, B. V., Rajagopalan, M. S., Heron, D. E., Flickinger, J. C., & Beriwal, S. (2015). Clinical pathways: A catalyst for the adoption of hypofractionation for early-stage breast cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 93(4), 854–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.08.013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free