Congress in Black and White: Race and Representation in Washington and at Home

9Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The symbolic importance of Barack Obama’s election is without question. But beyond symbolism, does the election of African-American politicians matter? Grose argues that it does and presents a unified theory of representation. Electing African-American legislators yields more federal dollars and congressional attention directed toward African-American voters. However, race and affirmative action gerrymandering have no impact on public policy passed in Congress. Grose is the first to examine a natural experiment and exceptional moment in history in which black legislators - especially in the U.S. South - represented districts with a majority of white constituents. This is the first systematic examination of the effect of a legislator’s race above and beyond the effect of constituency racial characteristics. Grose offers policy prescriptions, including the suggestion that voting rights advocates, the courts, and redistricters draw ‘black decisive districts’, electorally competitive districts that are likely to elect African Americans.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grose, C. R. (2011). Congress in Black and White: Race and Representation in Washington and at Home. Congress in Black and White: Race and Representation in Washington and at Home (pp. 1–242). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976827

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free