MEKANISME EKSTERNAL VS MEKANISME INTERNAL PADA KONSERVATISME AKUNTANSI:MANA YANG LEBIH EFEKTIF?

  • Dewi V
  • Rahayuningsih D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The fundamental purpose of this study is to get empirical evidence that influence accounting conservatism on non financial listed company. This study selected seven variables are litigation risk, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, debt covenant, board size, independent commissioners, and leverage as independent variable. The population in this study is non financial companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) over the three years periode 2018-2020. This study used 633 sample data that selected using purposive sampling method. Hypothesis in this research was analyzed by multiple linear regression. The result of this study indicate that litigation risk, board size and leverage have influence towards accounting conservatism. Beside another independent variables such as magerial ownership, institutional ownership, debt covenant, and independent commissioners have no influence toward accounting conservatism.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dewi, V., & Rahayuningsih, D. A. (2023). MEKANISME EKSTERNAL VS MEKANISME INTERNAL PADA KONSERVATISME AKUNTANSI:MANA YANG LEBIH EFEKTIF? Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 25(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.34208/jba.v25i1.1406

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free